Schwartz v. Eisner

170 A. 615, 112 N.J.L. 383, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 284
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedFebruary 2, 1934
StatusPublished

This text of 170 A. 615 (Schwartz v. Eisner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schwartz v. Eisner, 170 A. 615, 112 N.J.L. 383, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 284 (N.J. 1934).

Opinion

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Case, in the Supreme Court.CT Court of Errors and Appeals.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, LLOYD, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, DILL, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None. *Page 384

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
170 A. 615, 112 N.J.L. 383, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 284, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schwartz-v-eisner-nj-1934.