Schwartz v. Cuomo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Schwartz v. Cuomo

59 A.D.2d 946, 399 N.Y.S.2d 471, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14192

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 28, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 59 A.D.2d 946 (Schwartz v. Cuomo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schwartz v. Cuomo, 59 A.D.2d 946, 399 N.Y.S.2d 471, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14192 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to review so much of a determination of the respondent Secretary of State, dated December 15, 1976, as, after a hearing, held that petitioner had demonstrated untrustworthiness (Real Property Law, § 441-c) and suspended her real estate salesperson’s license for a period of one month. Determination confirmed insofar as reviewed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, with costs. There is substantial evidence in the record to support the finding that petitioner had demonstrated untrustworthiness when she made objectionable and inaccurate remarks intended to encourage racial bias (see Foreman Enterprises v Department of State of State of N. Y, 58 AD2d 801). Hopkins, J. P., Latham, Cohalan and Damiani, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to review so much of a determination of the respondent Secretary of State, dated December 15, 1976, as, after a hearing, held that petitioner had demonstrated untrustworthiness (Real Property Law, § 441-c) and suspended her real estate salesperson’s license for a period of one month. Determination confirmed insofar as reviewed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, with costs. There is substantial evidence in the record to support the finding that petitioner had demonstrated untrustworthiness when she made objectionable and inaccurate remarks intended to encourage racial bias (see Foreman Enterprises v Department of State of State of N. Y, 58 AD2d 801). Hopkins, J. P., Latham, Cohalan and Damiani, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 A.D.2d 946, 399 N.Y.S.2d 471, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14192, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schwartz-v-cuomo-nyappdiv-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack