Dorothy Forman Enterprises v. Department of State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Dorothy Forman Enterprises v. Department of State

58 A.D.2d 801, 396 N.Y.S.2d 250, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12964

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 5, 1977

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 58 A.D.2d 801 (Dorothy Forman Enterprises v. Department of State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dorothy Forman Enterprises v. Department of State, 58 A.D.2d 801, 396 N.Y.S.2d 250, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12964 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR 78, inter alia, to review so much of a determination of the Secretary of State of the State of New York, dated December 15, 1976, as, after a hearing, held that petitioner Dorothy Forman had demonstrated untrustworthiness (Real Property Law, § 441-c) and suspended her license for a period of two months, or, in the alternative, imposed a $250 fine. Determination confirmed insofar as reviewed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, with costs. There is substantial evidence in the record to support the finding that Dorothy Forman had demonstrated untrustworthiness when she made racially discriminatory remarks. The penalty imposed was proper (see Matter of Butterly & Green v Lomenzo, 36 NY2d 250). Hopkins, J. P., Martuscello, Margett and O’Connor, JJ. concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR 78, inter alia, to review so much of a determination of the Secretary of State of the State of New York, dated December 15, 1976, as, after a hearing, held that petitioner Dorothy Forman had demonstrated untrustworthiness (Real Property Law, § 441-c) and suspended her license for a period of two months, or, in the alternative, imposed a $250 fine. Determination confirmed insofar as reviewed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, with costs. There is substantial evidence in the record to support the finding that Dorothy Forman had demonstrated untrustworthiness when she made racially discriminatory remarks. The penalty imposed was proper (see Matter of Butterly & Green v Lomenzo, 36 NY2d 250). Hopkins, J. P., Martuscello, Margett and O’Connor, JJ. concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

58 A.D.2d 801, 396 N.Y.S.2d 250, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12964, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dorothy-forman-enterprises-v-department-of-state-nyappdiv-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack