Schuster v. City of New York

New York Supreme Court

Schuster v. City of New York

20 Misc. 2d 519, 191 N.Y.S.2d 884, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3007

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 18, 1959

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 20 Misc. 2d 519 (Schuster v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schuster v. City of New York, 20 Misc. 2d 519, 191 N.Y.S.2d 884, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3007 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

Benjamin Brenner, J.

Motion to . examine George P. Monaghan, a former Police Commissioner of the City of New York, as a witness on the ground that said individual is a hostile witness. The former Commissioner may reasonably be presumed to be an unfriendly or unwilling, if not a hostile witness, and the motion to examine him is, therefore, granted. The motion papers do not indicate the items upon which the examination is to be had and such examination will therefore be limited to the items allowed in the companion motion decided herewith (Schuster v. City of New York, 20 Misc 2d 516).

Settle order on notice providing for the examination to be held at Special Term, Part II of this court, at a time and on a date to be fixed in the order to be entered hereon if the parties agree. If the parties cannot agree, the court will fix the time.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Benjamin Brenner, J.

Motion to . examine George P. Monaghan, a former Police Commissioner of the City of New York, as a witness on the ground that said individual is a hostile witness. The former Commissioner may reasonably be presumed to be an unfriendly or unwilling, if not a hostile witness, and the motion to examine him is, therefore, granted. The motion papers do not indicate the items upon which the examination is to be had and such examination will therefore be limited to the items allowed in the companion motion decided herewith (Schuster v. City of New York, 20 Misc 2d 516).

Settle order on notice providing for the examination to be held at Special Term, Part II of this court, at a time and on a date to be fixed in the order to be entered hereon if the parties agree. If the parties cannot agree, the court will fix the time.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 Misc. 2d 519, 191 N.Y.S.2d 884, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3007, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schuster-v-city-of-new-york-nysupct-1959.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack