Schuppener v. Stein
This text of 374 So. 2d 555 (Schuppener v. Stein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from an order refusing to set aside a default and a final judgment based thereon. We find no error in the trial court’s refusal to vacate the default. However, since the appellees’ complaint requested a jury trial we believe it was error [556]*556for the trial court to assess damages against the appellants absent appellants’ waiver of a jury trial. Eastern Koex Company Ltd. v. Bonanza Import and Export, Inc., 360 So.2d 153 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Bader Bros. Van Lines, Inc. v. Jay, 183 So.2d 867 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966); Loiselle v. Gladfelter, 160 So.2d 740 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964) cert. disch. 165 So.2d 767 (Fla.1964).
Accordingly, the order of the trial court is affirmed in part and reversed in part with directions for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
374 So. 2d 555, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15140, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schuppener-v-stein-fladistctapp-1979.