Gladfelter v. Loiselle
This text of 165 So. 2d 767 (Gladfelter v. Loiselle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On petitioner’s request, writ of certiorari was granted and oral argument authorized pursuant to Article V, Section 4(2) of the Constitution of Florida, F.S.A. because of a certificate of the District Court of Appeal, Third District, that their decision in Loiselle v. Gladfelter, 160 So.2d 740 “passes upon a question of great public interest.” After further consideration we hold that the opinion of the District Court, supra, properly disposes of the questions of law presented and is approved by this court.
Accordingly the writ of certiorari heretofore entered is discharged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
165 So. 2d 767, 1964 Fla. LEXIS 2821, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gladfelter-v-loiselle-fla-1964.