Gladfelter v. Loiselle

165 So. 2d 767, 1964 Fla. LEXIS 2821
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 1, 1964·No. No. 33407·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On petitioner’s request, writ of certiorari was granted and oral argument authorized pursuant to Article V, Section 4(2) of the Constitution of Florida, F.S.A. because of a certificate of the District Court of Appeal, Third District, that their decision in Loiselle v. Gladfelter, 160 So.2d 740 “passes upon a question of great public interest.” After further consideration we hold that the opinion of the District Court, supra, properly disposes of the questions of law presented and is approved by this court.

Accordingly the writ of certiorari heretofore entered is discharged.

DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, THORNAL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gladfelter v. Loiselle, 165 So. 2d 767, 1964 Fla. LEXIS 2821 (Fla. 1964).

165 So. 2d 767 (Gladfelter v. Loiselle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Curbelo v. Ullman
571 So. 2d 443 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)
Hall v. Morozewych
686 P.2d 708 (Alaska Supreme Court, 1984)
Ansel v. Kizer
428 So. 2d 671 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Jayre Inc. v. WACHOVIA BANK & TR. CO.
420 So. 2d 937 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Schuppener v. Stein
374 So. 2d 555 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
Eastern Koex Co. Ltd., Inc. v. Bonanza Import, Etc.
360 So. 2d 153 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)
Bader Bros. Van Lines, Inc. v. Jay
183 So. 2d 867 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)