Schumert-Warfield-Buja, Inc. v. Buie

87 So. 726, 148 La. 726, 1921 La. LEXIS 1336
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedFebruary 28, 1921
DocketNo. 23842
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 87 So. 726 (Schumert-Warfield-Buja, Inc. v. Buie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schumert-Warfield-Buja, Inc. v. Buie, 87 So. 726, 148 La. 726, 1921 La. LEXIS 1336 (La. 1921).

Opinion

PRO VO STY, J.

[1-3] On receiving notice to vacate the leased premises, the plaintiff company enjoined the defendant, its-lessors, from instituting eviction proceedings or from [727]*727attempting eviction in any other unlawful manner, or by any other means. As plaintiff does not pretend to have had reason to apprehend, or to have in fact apprehended, that eviction would be attempted in any other manner than by judicial proceedings, the injunction was aimed solely ,at the latter. It was granted inadvertently, for nothing is better settled than that injunction will not lie to prevent the bringing of a suit (Le Blanc v. New Orleans, 138 La. 243, and long list of cases at page 267, 70 South. 212, at pages 220 and 221; Reynaud v. Uncle Sam Co., 146 La. 400, 83 South. 688), and was accordingly promptly dissolved. Plaintiff should have desisted from further prosecution of this suit, but, instead of so doing, appealed. The appeal was manifestly frivolous, and damages as for frivolous appeal nfust be awarded to defendant. Usually in such cases the allowance is 10 per cent, on the amount involved. Nothing showing, however, by how much the amount involved in this case exceeds the lower'limit of the jurisdiction of this court, $2,000, we will adopt that figure as the basis of computation and fix the damages, at $200. If that allowance falls short of the expenses and losses which the appeal has caused defendant, the latter have but themselves to blame for not having furnished proof of a higher basis for computation of the damages.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment appealed from be affirmed, and that the defendants, Irma Buie and the C. C. Cordill Investment Company, have judgment against Schumert-Warfield-Buja, Incorporated, in the sum of $200, with legal interest thereon from this date, and that the plaintiffs pay the costs of this suit.

O’NIELL, J., dissents from that part of the decree allowing damages for frivolous appeal, and otherwise concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ryan v. Calcasieu Parish Police Jury
256 So. 3d 1044 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2018)
Stacey A. Ryan v. Calcasieu Parish Police Jury
Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2018
Hooper v. Hero Lands Co.
128 So. 3d 691 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2013)
Lenfants Caterers v. Firemen's Charitable
386 So. 2d 1053 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1980)
Blue Arm v. Volk
254 N.W.2d 427 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1977)
Muller v. Landry
170 So. 2d 922 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1965)
Levee Const. Co. v. Equitable Casualty & Surety Co.
138 So. 431 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1931)
Kuhn v. Breard
92 So. 52 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
87 So. 726, 148 La. 726, 1921 La. LEXIS 1336, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schumert-warfield-buja-inc-v-buie-la-1921.