Schumacher v. Director, N.D. Department of Transportation
This text of 2008 ND 19 (Schumacher v. Director, N.D. Department of Transportation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 2/21/08 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2008 ND 22
William Sandoval, Petitioner and Appellant
v.
Department of Transportation, Respondent and Appellee
No. 20070295
Appeal from the District Court of Stark County, Southwest Judicial District, the Honorable Allan L. Schmalenberger, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Kelly M. Armstrong (appeared) and Ashley Holmes (argued), third-year law student, of Reichert Armstrong Law Office, 513 Elks Drive, Dickinson, N.D. 58601, for petitioner and appellant.
Andrew Moraghan (argued), Assistant Attorney General, Office of Attorney General, 500 N. 9th St., Bismarck, N.D. 58501-4509, for respondent and appellee.
Sandoval v. Department of Transportation
[¶1] William Sandoval appeals from a district court judgment affirming a North Dakota Department of Transportation order revoking Sandoval’s driving privileges for three years. Sandoval argued the arresting officer did not have reasonable and articulable suspicion to stop his vehicle. We conclude the agency's order is supported by a preponderance of the evidence and summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(5).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Mary Muehlen Maring
Daniel J. Crothers
Dale V. Sandstrom
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2008 ND 19, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schumacher-v-director-nd-department-of-transportat-nd-2008.