Schumacher v. Director, N.D. Department of Transportation
Opinion
Filed 2/21/08 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2008 ND 22
William Sandoval, Petitioner and Appellant
v.
Department of Transportation, Respondent and Appellee
No. 20070295
Appeal from the District Court of Stark County, Southwest Judicial District, the Honorable Allan L. Schmalenberger, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Kelly M. Armstrong (appeared) and Ashley Holmes (argued), third-year law student, of Reichert Armstrong Law Office, 513 Elks Drive, Dickinson, N.D. 58601, for petitioner and appellant.
Andrew Moraghan (argued), Assistant Attorney General, Office of Attorney General, 500 N. 9th St., Bismarck, N.D. 58501-4509, for respondent and appellee.
Sandoval v. Department of Transportation
No. 20070295
Per Curiam.
[¶1] William Sandoval appeals from a district court judgment affirming a North Dakota Department of Transportation order revoking Sandoval’s driving privileges for three years. Sandoval argued the arresting officer did not have reasonable and articulable suspicion to stop his vehicle. We conclude the agency's order is supported by a preponderance of the evidence and summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(5).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Mary Muehlen Maring
Daniel J. Crothers
Dale V. Sandstrom
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2008 ND 19 (Schumacher v. Director, N.D. Department of Transportation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.