Sandoval v. Department of Transportation
This text of 2008 ND 22 (Sandoval v. Department of Transportation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 2/21/08 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2008 ND 19
Ricky Ray Schumacher, Plaintiff and Appellant
v.
Director, North Dakota
Department of Transportation, Defendant and Appellee
No. 20070256
Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Thomas J. Schneider, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Michael Ray Hoffman, 120 North 3rd Street, Suite 100, P.O. Box 1056, Bismarck, ND 58502-1056, for plaintiff and appellant.
Andrew Moraghan, Assistant Attorney General, Office of Attorney General, 500 North 9th Street, Bismarck, ND 58501-4509, for defendant and appellee.
Schumacher v. Director, N.D. Dept. of Transportation
[¶1] Ricky Schumacher appeals the district court’s judgment affirming a North Dakota Department of Transportation decision revoking Schumacher’s driving privileges for three years because he was in actual physical control of a vehicle while being under the influence of intoxicating liquor.
[¶2] We affirm the judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(5).
[¶3] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Daniel J. Crothers
Dale V. Sandstrom
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Mary Muehlen Maring
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2008 ND 22, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sandoval-v-department-of-transportation-nd-2008.