Schum v. Burchard
148 N.E. 712, 240 N.Y. 577, 1925 N.Y. LEXIS 800
This text of 148 N.E. 712 (Schum v. Burchard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Schum v. Burchard, 148 N.E. 712, 240 N.Y. 577, 1925 N.Y. LEXIS 800 (N.Y. 1925).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed; with costs; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Cardozo, Crane and Lehman, JJ. Dissenting: Pound, McLaughlin and Andrews, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Weinstein v. Weinstein
36 A.D.3d 797 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Abrams v. Nat Lewis Purses, Inc.
172 Misc. 579 (New York Supreme Court, 1939)
Schum v. Burchard
148 N.E. 740 (New York Court of Appeals, 1925)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
148 N.E. 712, 240 N.Y. 577, 1925 N.Y. LEXIS 800, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schum-v-burchard-ny-1925.