Home/New York Court of Appeals/Schum v. Burchard

Schum v. Burchard

148 N.E. 712, 240 N.Y. 577, 1925 N.Y. LEXIS 800
New York Court of Appeals·Decided March 3, 1925·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Judgment affirmed; with costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Cardozo, Crane and Lehman, JJ. Dissenting: Pound, McLaughlin and Andrews, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schum v. Burchard, 148 N.E. 712, 240 N.Y. 577, 1925 N.Y. LEXIS 800 (N.Y. 1925).

148 N.E. 712 (Schum v. Burchard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Weinstein v. Weinstein
36 A.D.3d 797 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Abrams v. Nat Lewis Purses, Inc.
172 Misc. 579 (New York Supreme Court, 1939)
Schum v. Burchard
148 N.E. 740 (New York Court of Appeals, 1925)