Schulte v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.

76 Mo. 324
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedOctober 15, 1882
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 76 Mo. 324 (Schulte v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schulte v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co., 76 Mo. 324 (Mo. 1882).

Opinion

Norton, J.

This was a suit instituted before a justice of the peace to recover damages under the 43rd section of Railroad Law, (Wag. Stat., p. 310.) for stock injured and killed by defendant’s locomotive. Upon trial in the circuit court of Madison county, where the case had been taken by appeal, plaintiff had judgment, from which defendant has appealed.

On the'trial defendant objected to the introduction of any evidence on the ground that the statement did not set forth a cause of action. This objection was overruled and this action assigned for error. In the case of Rowland v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern R’y Co., 73 Mo. 619, it was held that a statement, to be sufficient under the said 4$d section, must aver that the stock were not killed within the limits of an incorporated town. Testing the sufficiency of the statement in this case by the above rule, the judgment must be reversed because of the lack of such an averment in the statement.

Inasmuch as it was held in the same case that when it is evident- that the statement filed before the justice in an action against a railroad company, for killing stock, is intended to be brought under the 43rd section of the Railroad Law, any insufficiency in the statement may be amended after the case has reached the circuit court, the cause will also be remanded, when the statement may be amended so as to conform to the rule laid down in the above case, as well as in the case of Bates v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain Southern R’y Co., 74 Mo. 60. Judgment reversed and cause remanded,

in which all concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dowdy v. Wamble
19 S.W. 489 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1892)
Dowdy v. Womble
41 Mo. App. 573 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1890)
State v. Brooks
5 S.W. 257 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1887)
Ward v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.
91 Mo. 168 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1886)
Manz v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.
87 Mo. 278 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1885)
Holland v. West End Narrow Gauge Railway Co.
16 Mo. App. 172 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1884)
Campbell v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.
78 Mo. 639 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1883)
Williams v. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad
80 Mo. 597 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1883)
Hudgens v. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad
79 Mo. 418 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1883)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
76 Mo. 324, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schulte-v-st-louis-iron-mountain-southern-railway-co-mo-1882.