Rowland v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.

73 Mo. 619
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided April 15, 1881·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

Sherwood, C. J.

The first and second counts in the statement filed with the justice of the peace, though obviously insufficient, yet contain sufficient matter to amend by, as it evidently inferentially refers to the 43rd section of the railroad act. The circuit court, therefore, committed no error in permitting the amendment of the statement when the cause came to that court by appeal.

But the amendment, when made, did not state facts constituting a cause of action, even under the section referred to, as amended, (Acts 1875, p. 131,) because the amended statement does not set forth that the hogs got on the railroad or were killed in consequence of the “failure to construct and maintain such fences or cattle-guards.” Luckie v. R. R. Co., 67 Mo. 245; Cunningham v. R. R. Co., 70 Mo. 202. From aught that appears in the amended statement the killing may have occurred within the limits of some incorporated town, where neither the law would require, nor the corporate authorities permit the defendant to fence its road. The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rowland v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co., 73 Mo. 619 (Mo. 1881).

73 Mo. 619 (Rowland v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stroeh v. McClintock
107 S.W. 416 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1908)
Menard v. Montana Central Railway Co.
56 P. 592 (Montana Supreme Court, 1899)
Dowdy v. Womble
41 Mo. App. 573 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1890)
Manz v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.
87 Mo. 278 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1885)
Watkins v. Donnelly
88 Mo. 322 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1885)
Holland v. West End Narrow Gauge Railway Co.
16 Mo. App. 172 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1884)
Mitchell v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.
82 Mo. 106 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1884)
Campbell v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.
78 Mo. 639 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1883)
Williams v. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad
80 Mo. 597 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1883)
Perriquez v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.
78 Mo. 91 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1883)
Wade v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.
78 Mo. 362 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1883)
Schulte v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.
76 Mo. 324 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1882)
Bates v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.
74 Mo. 60 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1881)