Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Schuller v. Todaro

Schuller v. Todaro

122 N.Y.S. 1144
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Schuller v. Todaro. Read the opinion of the Court — 136 A.D. 900 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 22, 1910·Published

Opinion

No opinion. Motion for reargument denied, without costs, and without prejudice to a renewal at Special Term of the motion for a stay, if the complaint in Todaro v. Somerville Realty Co., 122 N. Y. Supp. 509, has been amended to state a cause of action against the plaintiff herein. See, also, 120 N. Y. Supp. 1145.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schuller v. Todaro, 122 N.Y.S. 1144 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1910).

122 N.Y.S. 1144 (Schuller v. Todaro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Todaro v. Somerville Realty Co.
138 A.D. 1 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910)