Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Schuller v. Todaro

Schuller v. Todaro

138 A.D. 894
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Schuller v. Todaro. Read the opinion of the Court — 136 A.D. 900 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 15, 1910·Published

Opinion

Motion for reargument denied, without costs, and without prejudice to a renewal at Special Term of the motion for a stay if the complaint in Todaro v. Somerville Realty Co. (136 App. Div. 767; 137.id. 903) has been amended to state a cause of action against the plaintiff herein. Present—Jenks, Burr, Thomas, Rich and Carr, JJ. .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schuller v. Todaro, 138 A.D. 894 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1910).

138 A.D. 894 (Schuller v. Todaro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Todaro v. Somerville Realty Co.
136 A.D. 767 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910)