Schuhardt Consulting Profit Sharing Plan (Appellant/Cross-Appellee) v. Double Knobs Mountain Ranch, Inc.(Appellee/CRoss-Appellant)

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Schuhardt Consulting Profit Sharing Plan (Appellant/Cross-Appellee) v. Double Knobs Mountain Ranch, Inc.(Appellee/CRoss-Appellant). Read the opinion of the Court — 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 13417
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 11, 2015·No. 04-13-00529-CV·Published

Opinion

ACCEPTED 04-13-00529-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 2/11/2015 6:59:04 PM KEITH HOTTLE CLERK

NO. 04-13-00529-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 02/11/2015 6:59:04 PM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk SCHUHARDT CONSULTING PROFIT SHARING PLAN, Appellant

vs.

DOUBLE KNOBS MOUNTAIN RANCH, INC., Appellee

APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR EN BANC CONSIDERATION

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS:

Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 49.7 and Local Rule 6.2,

Appellant Schuhardt Consulting Profit Sharing Plan (Schuhardt) respectfully files

this Motion for En Banc Consideration.

Consideration en banc, while disfavored, is appropriate in cases were the

panel opinion conflicts with previous opinions of the court or presents an issue of

major importance. See TEX. R. APP. P. 41.2(c); Fazio v. Cypress/GR Houston I,

L.P., 403 S.W.3d 390, 411-12 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2013, pet. denied).

The Opinion of the panel in this case meets both of these situations.

First, the Opinion awards Appellee/Cross-Appellant attorney’s fees under

the Uniform Declaratory Judgment Act (UDJA), Chapter 37 of the Texas Civil

1 Practices & Remedies Code, in direct conflict with this Court’s holding in Mungia

v. Via Metropolitan Transit, 441 S.W.3d 542, 547-551 (Tex. App.—San Antonio

2014, no pet. h.).

Second, this Court’s Opinion has the potential to have a dramatic impact on

the construction of standard deeds of trust in Texas. The current State Bar of

Texas form Deed of Trust provides, in part, that “[i]f there is a default on the

Obligation or if Grantor fails to perform any of Grantor’s obligations and the

default continues after any required notice of the default and the time allowed to

cure . . .”1 then the lender may exercise its remedies. This language is similar to

that in the Deed of Trust and the Opinion. Before, invalidating language used in

the Deed of Trust and, potentially, in the State Bar form, the entire Court should

carefully consider this important issue.

For these reasons, and the reasons set forth in Schuhardt’s Motion For

Rehearing, Schuhardt respectfully requests a rehearing en banc.

PRAYER

Accordingly, Appellant Schuhardt Consulting Profit Sharing Plan prays the

points raised in its Motion for Rehearing be submitted for en banc consideration.

11 See Appendix Tab 5 at p. 3 ¶ 6.

2 Respectfully submitted:

/s/ Charles J. Cain Charles J. Cain State Bar No. 00796292 ccain@cstrial.com Steve Skarnulis State Bar No. 24041924 skarnulis@cstrial.com Ryan E. Chapple State Bar No. 24036354 rchapple@cstrial.com CAIN & SKARNULIS PLLC 400 W. 15th Street, Suite 900 Austin, Texas 78701 512-477-5000 512-477-5011—Fax ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT

3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Appellant’s Motion for En Banc Consideration was delivered to the following in accordance with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure on this the 9th day of February 2015:

John C. Howell Ray Leach jhowell@asdh.com rayleach@rayleachlaw.com ALLEN, STEIN & DURBIN, P.C. LAW OFFICES OF RAY LEACH 6243 IH-10 West, Suite 700 111 West Olmos Drive San Antonio, Texas 78201 San Antonio, Texas 78212 210-734-7488 210-930-7700 210-738-8036—Facsimile 210-930-9553—Facsimile

Leslie Luttrell Elizabeth Conry Davidson luttrell@lzlawgroup.com conrydavidson@gmail.com Luttrell Zucker Law Group Attorney at Law 400 N. Loop 1604 East, Suite 208 926 Chulie Drive San Antonio, Texas 78232 San Antonio, Texas 78216 210-426-3606—Facsimile 210-568-4036

/s/ Charles J. Cain Charles J. Cain

4 APPENDIX

Tab 5 Commercial Deed of Trust form prepared by the State Bar of Texas Prepared by the State Bar of Texas for use by lawyers only. © 1999, 2000, 2002, 2004, 2006, 2009 by the Stale Bar of Texas Revised 06/09

COMMERCIAL DEED OF TRUST Notice of confidentiality rights: If you are a natural person, you may remove or strike any or all of the following information from any instrument that transfers an interest in real property before it is filed for record in the public records: your Social Security number or your driver's license number.

Date:

Grantor:

Grantor's Mailing Address (including county):

Trustee:

Trustee's Mailing Address (including county):

Lender:

Lender's Mailing Address (including county):

Obligation

Note(s)

Original principal amount:

Borrower:

Maturity date:

Other Debt:

Appendix Tab 5 Property (including any improvements):

Prior Lien(s) (including recording information):

Other Exceptions to Conveyance and Warranty:

For value received and to secure payment of the Obligation, Grantor conveys the Property to Trustee in trust. Grantor war- rants and agrees to defend the title to the Property, subject to the Other Exceptions to Conveyance and Warranty. On payment of the Obligation and all other amounts secured by this deed of trust, this deed of trust will have no further effect, and Lender will release it at Grantor's expense.

Clauses and Covenants

A. Grantor's Obligations Grantor agrees to- 1. keep the Property in good repair and condition; 2. pay all taxes and assessments on the Property before delinquency; 3. defend title to the Property subject to the Other Exceptions to Conveyance and Warranty and preserve the lien's priority as it is established in this deed of trust; 4. maintain all insurance coverages with respect to the Property, revenues generated by the Property, and operations on the Property that Lender reasonably requires ("Required Insurance Coverages"), issued by insurers and written on policy forms acceptable to Lender, and deliver evidence of the Required Insurance Coverages in a form acceptable to Lender at least ten days before the expiration of the Required Insurance Coverages; 5. obey all laws, ordinances, and restrictive covenants applicable to the Property; 6. keep any buildings occupied as required by the Required Insurance Coverages; 7. if the lien of this deed of trust is not a first lien, pay or cause to be paid all prior lien notes and abide by or cause to be abided by all prior lien instruments; and 8. notify Lender of any change of address.

B. Lender's Rights 1. Lender or Lender's mortgage servicer may appoint in writing a substitute trustee, succeeding to all rights and responsibilities of Trustee. 2. If the proceeds of the Obligation are used to pay any debt secured by prior liens, Lender is subrogated to all the rights and liens of the holders of any debt so paid. 3. Lender may apply any proceeds received under the property insurance policies covering the Property either to reduce the Obligation or to repair or replace damaged or destroyed improvements covered by the policy. If the Property is Grantor's primary residence and Lender reasonably determines that repairs to the improvements are economically feasible, Lender will make the insurance proceeds available to Grantor for repairs. 4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schuhardt Consulting Profit Sharing Plan (Appellant/Cross-Appellee) v. Double Knobs Mountain Ranch, Inc.(Appellee/CRoss-Appellant), (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Schuhardt Consulting Profit Sharing Plan (Appellant/Cross-Appellee) v. Double Knobs Mountain Ranch, Inc.(Appellee/CRoss-Appellant) (Schuhardt Consulting Profit Sharing Plan (Appellant/Cross-Appellee) v. Double Knobs Mountain Ranch, Inc.(Appellee/CRoss-Appellant)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related