Schroder v. Schmidt

12 P. 302, 71 Cal. 399, 1886 Cal. LEXIS 599
California Supreme Court·Decided December 13, 1886·No. No. 9812·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

Sharpstein, J.

Respondent moves to have the appeals from the judgment and the order denying the motion for a new trial dismissed on the ground that the appeals were taken before the judgment was entered. That is doubtless a sufficient ground for dismissing the [400] appeal from the judgment. (McLaughlin v. Doherty, 54 Cal. 519; Thomas v. Anderson, 55 Cal. 43.) But the appeal from the order denying the motion for a new trial was taken within sixty days after the order was made. That is within the time prescribed by the code. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 939.) We think no sufficient ground for dismissing the appeal from the order denying the motion for a new trial has been shown in this case, and the motion to dismiss that appeal is denied.

Appeal from the judgment dismissed.

Thornton, J., McKinstry, J., Myrick, J., Morrison, C. J., and McKee, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schroder v. Schmidt, 12 P. 302, 71 Cal. 399, 1886 Cal. LEXIS 599 (Cal. 1886).

12 P. 302 (Schroder v. Schmidt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Banfield v. Schulderman
3 P.2d 116 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1931)
Whitney Central Trust & Savings Bank v. Nicolás Hernández & Co.
33 P.R. 876 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1925)
Whitney Central Trust & Savings Bank v. Nicolás Hernández y Ca.
33 P.R. Dec. 915 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1925)
Castrillón v. Castejón
27 P.R. 828 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1919)
Castrillón & Cía. v. Juez Municipal Sustituto de San Juan
27 P.R. Dec. 906 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1919)
Santti v. Hartman
161 P. 249 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1916)
Carlberg v. Field
140 N.W. 267 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1913)
Baldwin v. Santa Rosa Island Co.
77 P. 407 (California Supreme Court, 1904)
Kennedy v. Citizens' National Bank
93 N.W. 71 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1903)
Hodgins v. Harris
43 P. 72 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1895)
Durant v. Comegys
26 P. 755 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1891)
Tyrrell v. Baldwin
13 P. 475 (California Supreme Court, 1887)