Schreiber v. Cimato

299 A.D.2d 813, 750 N.Y.S.2d 546, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10824
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 2002·No. Appeal No. 1·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Appeal from, those parts of an order of Supreme Court, Erie County (Mahoney, J.), entered December 4, 2001, that denied defendants’ motion to preclude evidence of nonremediation damages and to dismiss all causes of action except the first cause of action.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law by granting that part of defendants’ motion seeking summary judgment dismissing the negligence cause of action and dismissing that cause of action and as modified the order is affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Schreiber v Cimato ([appeal No. 2] 299 AD2d 813). Present — Pine, J.P., Hayes, Kehoe, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schreiber v. Cimato, 299 A.D.2d 813, 750 N.Y.S.2d 546, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10824 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

299 A.D.2d 813 (Schreiber v. Cimato) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Citibank, N.A. v. Gifford
2022 NY Slip Op 02650 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
Fuchs & Bergh, Inc. v. Lance Enterprises, Inc.
48 A.D.3d 626 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Ruffing v. Union Carbide Corp.
308 A.D.2d 526 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)