Schradin v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad
This text of 87 N.E. 1126 (Schradin v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs, the court being of opinion that the act (Chapter 657 of the Laws of 1906) on which the defendant’s liability is based is constitutional, the classification that is made in that act being a reasonable one; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Oil. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Yann, Werner and Chase, JJ. Dissenting: Hisoook, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
87 N.E. 1126, 194 N.Y. 534, 1909 N.Y. LEXIS 1337, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schradin-v-new-york-central-hudson-river-railroad-ny-1909.