Schradin v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad
87 N.E. 1126, 194 N.Y. 534, 1909 N.Y. LEXIS 1337
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs, the court being of opinion that the act (Chapter 657 of the Laws of 1906) on which the defendant’s liability is based is constitutional, the classification that is made in that act being a reasonable one; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Oil. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Yann, Werner and Chase, JJ. Dissenting: Hisoook, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Schradin v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad, 87 N.E. 1126, 194 N.Y. 534, 1909 N.Y. LEXIS 1337 (N.Y. 1909).
87 N.E. 1126 (Schradin v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Deyo v. Adams
182 Misc. 459 (New York Supreme Court, 1944)
Ives v. South Buffalo Railway Co.
94 N.E. 431 (New York Court of Appeals, 1911)