School, Farm & Domestic Work Permits

38 Pa. D. & C. 359
CourtPennsylvania Department of Justice
DecidedMay 27, 1940
StatusPublished

This text of 38 Pa. D. & C. 359 (School, Farm & Domestic Work Permits) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Department of Justice primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
School, Farm & Domestic Work Permits, 38 Pa. D. & C. 359 (Pa. 1940).

Opinion

Barco, Deputy Attorney General,

This department has received your communication wherein you request an interpretation of the Act of June 24,1939, P. L. 786, 24 PS §1401 et seq., with respect to limitations of farm and domestic work permits to school children as provided therein.

You inform us that you have had numerous conferences with, and received many communications from, the Amish and Mennonites of Lancaster County, who are particularly interested in knowing if the law will permit the issuing of a farm or domestic work permit to children who have reached the age of 14 years, and who have finished six grades of public schooling.

You then ask us these questions:

1. Is there any legal method or procedure on the basis of which the Superintendent of Public Instruction, acting under authorization of this section of the school laws, may construe the sixth grade of the public schools as being “the highest grade of the elementary school organization prevailing” in a public school district which has not made provision for a junior high school organization or for a secondary school program beginning at the termination of grade six?

2. Is there any other provision or authorization of law under which the Superintendent of Public Instruction may so construe the authority delegated to him by the General Assembly as to enable him to authorize the granting of farm or domestic permits to pupils who have attained the age of at least 14 and have completed the sixth grade of the elementary schools but have not completed the remaining grades of the elementary school work [361]*361offered under the plan of organization prevailing .in the district in which the said child or children may reside?

These questions require us to review our laws relating to compulsory school attendance and particularly the School Code of May 18, 1911, P. L. 309, sec. 1414, as amended by section 2 of the Act of 1939, supra. In this review we have been guided by the principles enunciated by Chief Justice Kephart in Ehret v. Kulpmont Borough School Dist., 333 Pa. 518 (1939), wherein he says at page 522:

“The Constitution has placed the educational system in the hands of the legislature, free from any interference from the judiciary save as required by constitutional limitations. We may only, in problems such as this, ascertain the legislative intent. ... As we said in Walker’s Appeal, 332 Pa. 488: ‘The fundamental public policy, expressed in the Constitution and underlying school laws, is to obtain a better education for the children of the Commonwealth.’ The separate sections of the School Code all derive their inspiration from this source. Though containing individual policies in themselves, each is subordinate to this cardinal purpose.”

To answer properly the questions propounded by you, it will be necessary to construe the different sections of the various laws in the School Code which we believe have a bearing on the problem.

As you mentioned in your letter, our chief concern is the interpretation of the pertinent provisions of section 1416 of the School Code, supra, as amended by section 4 of the Act of 1939, supra. Part of section 4 of this act, which is pertinent to our problem, reads as follows:

“The provisions of this act requiring regular attendance shall not apply to any child who has attained the age of sixteen years, and who is regularly engaged in any useful and lawful employment or service during the time the public schools are in session, and who holds an employment certificate issued according to law; nor to any child who has been examined by an approved mental [362]*362clinic or by a person certified as a public school psychologist or psychological examiner, and has been found to be unable to profit from further public school attendance, and who has been reported to the board of school directors and excused, in accordance with regulations prescribed by the State Council of Education; nor shall the said provisions apply to any child who has attained the age of fifteen years and is engaged in farm work or domestic service in a private home on a permit issued by the school board or the designated school official of the school district of the child’s residence, in accordance with regulations which the Superintendent of Public Instruction is hereby authorized to prescribe: Provided, That such a permit may he issued to any child who is at least fourteen (lit) years of age and has satisfactorily completed, either in public or ■private schools, the equivalent of the highest grade of the elementary school organization prevailing in the public schools of the district in which he resides, if the issuance of such a permit has first been recommended by the county or district superintendent of schools having supervision of the schools of the district where such child resides, or by the principal of the private school where such child is enrolled, and such reason has been approved by the Superintendent of Public Instruction.”

This section, as amended, makes the following classification with relation to compulsory school attendance:

1. Any student or pupil who has attained 16 years of age, and who is regularly engaged in useful and lawful employment or service during school sessions, and who holds an employment certificate issued according to law, is exempt from compulsory school attendance.

2. The same is true in the case of “any child who has attained the age of fifteen years and is engaged in farm work or domestic service in a private home on a permit” duly issued.

3. An exemption may also be issued to any child 14 years old that has satisfactorily completed, either in public or private schools, the equivalent of the highest [363]*363grade of the elementary school organization prevailing-in the public schools of the district in which he or she resides, if the issuance of such permit has been approved by the Superintendent of Public Instruction.

We are chiefly concerned with this third group. It is evident that the solution to the problem depends on the meaning of “the equivalent of the highest grade of the elementary school organization prevailing in the public schools of the district in which he resides”. This section of itself does not indicate what is “the highest grade of the elementary school organization prevailing” in the district. Reference, therefore, must be made to other sections of the School Code which may indicate to us what constitutes “the highest grade of the elementary school organization prevailing” in the school district.

In considering these various provisions of the School Code, supra, art. IY, sec. 401, as amended by section 1 of the Act of May 24,1921, P. L. 1066, and section 8 of the Act of May 29,1931, P. L. 243, we find that:

“The board of school directors in every school district in this Commonwealth shall establish, equip, furnish, and maintain a sufficient number of elementary public schools . . . to educate every person, residing in such district between the ages of six and twenty-one years, who may attend; and may establish, equip, furnish, and maintain the following additional schools . . . for the education . . . of persons residing in said district and for the proper operation of its schools . . . when established, shall be an integral part of the public school system in such school district, and shall be so administered, namely:

“High schools . . .”.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ehret v. Kulpmont Borough School District
5 A.2d 188 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1938)
Walker's Appeal
2 A.2d 770 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
38 Pa. D. & C. 359, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/school-farm-domestic-work-permits-padeptjust-1940.