School District No. 2. v. Conrad
17 Kan. 522
Opinion
The opinion of the court was delivered by
The only question presented in this case is, whether a sub-contractor, under the provisions of the act relating to liens of mechanics and others, (laws of 1872, pp. 294, 297,) can secure a lien upon a public school-house erected by a school district. We answer in the affirmative, and refer to the recent case of Wilson v. School District, (ante, p. 104,) as containing our reasons for the conclusion herein, and for a full discussion of the subject.
The judgment will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
School District No. 2. v. Conrad, 17 Kan. 522 (kan 1877).
17 Kan. 522 (School District No. 2. v. Conrad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Thompson Transport Co. v. Middlestates Construction Co.
397 P.2d 368 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1964)
Huttig Millwork Co. v. Randel
266 P. 106 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1928)
Hutchinson v. Krueger
1912 OK 368 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912)
Board of Commissioners v. Snodgrass & Young Manufacturing Co.
52 Kan. 253 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1893)