School Committee v. Labor Relations Commission

707 N.E.2d 828, 46 Mass. App. Ct. 921, 1999 Mass. App. LEXIS 325
Massachusetts Appeals Court·Decided March 26, 1999·No. No. 97-P-2154·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

We affirm the decisions of the Labor Relations Commission on the authority of School Comm, of Lowell v. Local 159, Serv. Employees Inti. Union, 42 Mass. App. Ct. 690, 693 (1997). As more fully explicated in that decision, the Education Reform Act of 1993, St. 1993, c. 71, did not abrogate collective bargaining agreements with school committees insofar as the agreements concerned terms and conditions of employment or procedures for making appointments, as opposed to decisions about hiring or firing designated categories of school employees (in these cases, club coaches, club advisors, and athletic coaches).

Decisions of Labor Relations Commission affirmed.

The cases were submitted on briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

School Committee v. Labor Relations Commission, 707 N.E.2d 828, 46 Mass. App. Ct. 921, 1999 Mass. App. LEXIS 325 (Mass. Ct. App. 1999).

707 N.E.2d 828 (School Committee v. Labor Relations Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

School Committee v. United Educators
784 N.E.2d 11 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 2003)
School Committee v. Newton School Custodians Ass'n
784 N.E.2d 598 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 2003)
School Committee of Peabody v. Peabody Federation of Teachers, Local 1289
748 N.E.2d 992 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 2001)