Scholing v. O'Conner
209 A.D. 839
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1924·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
The briefs of the appeUant contain accusations and criticisms directed against defendants’ trial counsel which we deem to be wholly unjustifiable. The conduct of the appeUant’s counsel in this respect does not meet with our approval, and we, therefore, direct that his briefs be removed from the files of the court. Order unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Scholing v. O'Conner, 209 A.D. 839 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1924).
209 A.D. 839 (Scholing v. O'Conner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re the Accounting of Moran
23 A.D.2d 623 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1965)
Baylis v. Wood
246 A.D. 779 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1935)