Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Scholing v. O'Conner

Scholing v. O'Conner

209 A.D. 839
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 15, 1924
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 209 A.D. 839 (Scholing v. O'Conner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scholing v. O'Conner, 209 A.D. 839 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1924).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The briefs of the appeUant contain accusations and criticisms directed against defendants’ trial counsel which we deem to be wholly unjustifiable. The conduct of the appeUant’s counsel in this respect does not meet with our approval, and we, therefore, direct that his briefs be removed from the files of the court. Order unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Accounting of Moran
23 A.D.2d 623 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1965)
Baylis v. Wood
246 A.D. 779 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
209 A.D. 839, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scholing-v-oconner-nyappdiv-1924.