In re the Accounting of Moran

23 A.D.2d 623, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4796
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 25, 1965·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed, with costs to respondents payable out of the estate. Appellant’s reply brief is stricken and expunged from the records of this court. Memorandum: Whether the issue as decided was one of law or fact, we agree that the conclusion reached by the Surrogate was correct. Appellant’s reply brief is permeated with accusations and criticisms directed against respondents’ counsel and the Surrogate which we deem to be wholly unjustifiable. It should, therefore, be expunged from the records of this court. (Scholing v. O’Connor, 209 App. Div. 839; Baylis v. Wood, 246 App. Div. 779.) (Appeal by administrator from an order of Niagara Surro[624]*624gate’s Court directing the payment of proceeds of a joint bank account in Ms name to name of decedent.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Henry and Noonan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Accounting of Moran, 23 A.D.2d 623, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4796 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

23 A.D.2d 623 (In re the Accounting of Moran) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Maestracci v. Helly Nahmad Gallery, Inc.
2017 NY Slip Op 7676 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)