Schoicket v. State
This text of 304 Ga. 255 (Schoicket v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
304 Ga. 255 FINAL COPY
S18A0632. SCHOICKET v. THE STATE.
HUNSTEIN, Justice.
Rebecca Dawn Schoicket appeals the denial of her “Motion for
Documents and Records at Government Expense.” We dismiss the appeal.
In 2015, Schoicket pled guilty to, inter alia, felony murder and was
sentenced to life imprisonment plus five years; she did not appeal. In June
2017, Schoicket filed a “Motion for Documents and Records at Government
Expense,” wherein she sought a copy of the transcript of her guilty plea, any
audio- and video-recorded interviews, and various documents that, she said,
were necessary for “post-conviction relief.” The trial court denied the motion,
and Schoicket filed a timely notice of appeal.
Schoicket continues to argue on appeal that, because she is indigent, she
is entitled to a transcript and various documents at government expense for the
purpose of pursuing post-conviction relief. It is true that “an indigent, on
appeal, is entitled as a matter of right to a free copy of the transcript of trial court proceedings in which he has been a party.” (Citations and punctuation omitted.)
Mitchell v. State, 280 Ga. 802, 802 (1) (633 SE2d 539) (2006). However,
[w]hile an indigent is entitled to a copy of his trial transcript for a direct appeal of his conviction, such is not the case in collateral post-conviction proceedings. After the time for appeal has expired there is no due process or equal protection right to a free copy of one’s court records absent a showing of necessity or justification.
(Citations and punctuation omitted.) McDowell v. Balkcom, 246 Ga. 611 (272
SE2d 280) (1980). Here, we are well outside the time for appeal, and Schoicket
has failed to make any showing of necessity or justification. See Shelby v.
McDaniel, 266 Ga. 215, 215 (465 SE2d 433) (1996) (recognizing that, after the
time to appeal has expired, a copy of a pending or proposed habeas petition
should be attached to the pleading seeking records at government expense).
Schoicket’s untimely motion is thus a nullity, which should have been dismissed
below, and cannot sustain an appeal. See Henderson v. State, 303 Ga. 241 (2)
(811 SE2d 388) (2018). This appeal, therefore, is dismissed. Id.
Appeal dismissed. Hines, C. J., Melton, P. J., Benham, Nahmias,
Blackwell, Boggs, and Peterson, JJ., concur.
2 Decided August 20, 2018.
Murder. Walton Superior Court. Before Judge Ozburn.
Rebecca Dawn Schoicket, pro se.
Layla H. Zon, District Attorney, W. Cliff Howard, Assistant District
Attorney; Christopher M. Carr, Attorney General, Patricia B. Attaway Burton,
Deputy Attorney General, Paula K. Smith, Senior Assistant Attorney General,
for appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
304 Ga. 255, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schoicket-v-state-ga-2018.