Schofield v. White-Rodgers Division of Emerson Electric Co.
170 A.D.2d 953
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 1, 1991
DocketAppeal No. 2
StatusPublished
This text of 170 A.D.2d 953 (Schofield v. White-Rodgers Division of Emerson Electric Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Schofield v. White-Rodgers Division of Emerson Electric Co., 170 A.D.2d 953 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Same Memorandum as in Schofield v White-Rodgers Div. ([appeal No. 1] 170 AD2d 952 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Ontario County, Boehm, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Den-man, Green, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Schofield v. White-Rodgers Division of Emerson Electric Co.
170 A.D.2d 952 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
170 A.D.2d 953, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schofield-v-white-rodgers-division-of-emerson-electric-co-nyappdiv-1991.