Schoenadel v. YouGov America, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided April 28, 2023·No. 1:22-cv-10236·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□ |X TRACY SCHOENADEL, : . Case No. 1:22-cv-10236 (IMF) Plaintiff, : : STIPULATION AND [RROPOSED) -against- . PROTECTIVE ORDER GOVERNING ’ THE TREATMENT OF YOUGOV AMERICA, INC., . CONFIDENTIAL AND HIGHLY ’ CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL Defendant. :

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties to this lawsuit (the “Parties”), through their respective counsel, that this Stipulation and Order governs the use and handling of documents, exhibits, deposition testimony, video and audio tapes and other information and documentation, including all copies, excerpts and summaries thereof (collectively, “Material”), produced by any Party to another Party in connection with the above-captioned lawsuit (the “Action”). Any Party may designate as “Confidential” any Material which is produced by any Party or non-Party in response to document requests, interrogatories, or subpoenas served in this proceeding, or other discovery obligations herein, when such designating Party in good faith believes that the Material contains sensitive security, safety, financial, personal, medical, commercial or proprietary business information relating to such Party, and/or such Party’s current or former employees, the public disclosure of which may have an adverse effect on the personal, financial, non-public and proprietary information, commercial or business reputation or interests of such Party or such Party’s current or former employees (“Confidential Material”). Any Party may designate as “Highly Confidential” any Material which is produced by any Party or non-Party in response to document requests, interrogatories, or subpoenas served in this

1279247 v1

proceeding, or other discovery obligations herein, when such designating Party in good faith believes that the Material includes or constitutes confidential or proprietary information of the producing Party (or of a third party where the producing party is under a duty to maintain the information in confidence) which, if disclosed to the requesting Party, would likely result in serious injury or harm to the producing Party’s or a third party’s, financial, business or personal reputation or interest (“Highly Confidential Material”). 1, Confidential Material shall be subject to the following restrictions: (a) Confidential Material shall be used only for the purpose of the Action (including appeals, if any), and not for any other purpose whatsoever, and shall not be given, shown, made available or communicated in any way to anyone except those to whom it is necessary that such Confidential Material be given or shown for the purposes permitted under this paragraph 1, as set forth in subparagraph (b) below. (b) Confidential Material shall not be disclosed except to: (i) the Parties, counsel of record and other counsel for the Parties in this Action and such employees, experts, contractors, agents and consultants working with counsel, if any, in connection with this Action; (ii) the litigation forums in which the Action may proceed (including the Court, court reporters, stenographic reporters); (iv) witnesses who counsel for a Party in good faith believes may be called to testify at deposition or trial in the Action and the documents are relevant to that witness’s anticipated deposition or trial testimony, provided such person has first executed Attachment A; 1279247 vi

(v) as to any document, its author, its addressee, and any other person indicated on the face of the document as having received a copy or any person who otherwise lawfully received the Confidential Material prior to the commencement of this Action: and (vi) | any mediator that the parties engage in this matter or that the Court appoints. {c) All materials designated as confidential are treated as such until the parties reach an alternative agreement regarding their treatment at trial as part of the parties’ Joint Pre- Trial Order and/or at the final Pre-Trial Conference. 2. Each person given access to Confidential Material pursuant to the terms hereof (a “Non-party”) shall be advised that: (a) the Confidential Material is being disclosed pursuant to and subject to the terms of this Order and may not be disclosed or used other than pursuant to the terms hereof; and (b) that the violation of the terms of this Order (by use of the Confidential Material in any impermissible manner) may constitute a violation of a Court order. Before a non-Party is given access to Confidential Material, he/she must read and agree in writing or on the record before a court reporter to be bound by the provisions of this Order (in the form of an Acknowledgment attached hereto as “Attachment A”). Each Party and its respective counsel agree to notify counsel for all other Parties immediately if it obtains knowledge or information that a Non-party is about to disclose, or has disclosed, Confidential Material to persons who have not agreed to be bound by the provisions of this Order. 3. Highly Confidential Material shall be subject to the following restrictions: (a) | Highly Confidential Material shall be used only for the purpose of the Action {including appeals, if any), and not for any other purpose whatsoever, and shall not be given, shown, made available or communicated in any way to anyone except those to whom it is 1279247 v1

necessary that such Highly Confidential Material be given or shown for the purposes permitted under this paragraph 3, as set forth in subparagraph (b) below. (b) Highly Confidential Material shall not be disclosed except to: (i) the litigation forums in which the Action may proceed (including the Court, court reporters, stenographic reporters); (ii) outside counsel for a Party to the Action (i.e., counsel for a Party who is not an employee of the Party or any of its affiliates) and employees of such outside counsel who are actively involved in the Action. In the event that the outside counsel is not counsel of record, such counsel may be furnished Highly Confidential Material only after that counsel has executed a copy of the Acknowledgment attached hereto as Attachment “A”; (iii) the Parties to the Action, and only if shown the Highly Confidential Material in person by the Party’s counsel with counsel present, and so long as the Party does not copy, duplicate, photograph or remove the Highly Confidential Material from counsel’s possession; (iv) experts who have a legitimate need to review the Highly Confidential Material and have executed a copy of the Acknowledgement attached hereto as Attachment “A”; (v) independent litigation support services personnel, including copying services, imaging and coding services, trial exhibit preparation services, solely for the purpose of assisting a Party with the litigation; and (vi) other persons as ordered by the Court or agreed to in writing or on the record by the Parties. 1279247 vi

(c) In addition, materials designated as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL may be disclosed to one specially designated in-house legal employee of a Party to the lawsuit and the immediate staff of such employee whose involvement in the Action is necessary to the prosecution and/or defense of the Action, provided that a copy of the Acknowledgment attached hereto as Attachment “A” signed by the specially-designated in-house legal employee shall have been served on all other Parties no less than three (3) days prior to such disclosure, and provided further that the producing Party has not objected to such disclosure. In the event that the producing Party objects to the disclosure, the Party seeking disclosure may move for entry of an order from the Court to allow disclosure to the specially-designated in-house legal employee, and to seek a prompt ruling by the Court on same.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schoenadel v. YouGov America, Inc., (S.D.N.Y. 2023).

Schoenadel v. YouGov America, Inc. (Schoenadel v. YouGov America, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga
435 F.3d 110 (Second Circuit, 2006)