Schneyder v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.

CourtDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts
DecidedNovember 27, 2018
Docket1:18-cv-12459
StatusUnknown

This text of Schneyder v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp. (Schneyder v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Massachusetts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schneyder v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp., (D. Mass. 2018).

Opinion

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: STRYKER LFIT V40 FEMORAL HEAD PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2768

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO —38)

On April 5, 2017, the Panel transferred 3 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See 249 F.Supp.3d 1353 (J.P.M.L. 2017). Since that time, 107 additional action(s) have been transferred to the District of Massachusetts. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Indira Talwani. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the District of Massachusetts and assigned to Judge Talwani. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the District of Massachusetts for the reasons stated in the order of April 5, 2017, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Indira Talwani. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7—day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel. Inasmuch as no objection is ee time, the FOR THE PANEL: Nov 27, 2018 : perp eens Jeffery N. Liithi Clerk of the Panel

IN RE: STRYKER LFIT V40 FEMORAL HEAD MDL No. 2768 PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

NS SCHEDULE CTO-38 — TAG-ALONG ACTIO DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION

IFORNIA NORTHERN 06527 Schneyder v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp. 18- CAN 5

| hereby certify onl | a7) Bina the foregoing document is true and correct copy of the C] electronic docket in the captioned electronically filed original filed on QT" Original filed in my office ON amnesia Robert M. Farrel] Cierk, U.S. District Court Di assachusetts huh Deputy Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Stryker Orthopaedics LFIT V40 Femoral Head Products Liability Litigation
249 F. Supp. 3d 1353 (Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Schneyder v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schneyder-v-howmedica-osteonics-corp-mad-2018.