Schneider v. Delo

Eighth Circuit

Schneider v. Delo

105 F.3d 400, 1997 WL 30658

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided January 24, 1997·No. Nos. 95-2969EM, 97-8008·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner Eric Adam Schneider applies for leave to file a second petition for a writ of habeas corpus or, in the alternative, seeks an order recalling the mandate and granting him a rehearing. He also seeks a stay of execution pending resolution of the matter and leave to file in forma pauperis. The arguments in this motion are substantially similar to those we rejected in Schneider’s previous pro se petition. For the reasons stated in that opinion, we deny the application to file a second petition as well as the motions recalling the mandate and for a stay of execution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner Eric Adam Schneider applies for leave to file a second petition for a writ of habeas corpus or, in the alternative, seeks an order recalling the mandate and granting him a rehearing. He also seeks a stay of execution pending resolution of the matter and leave to file in forma pauperis. The arguments in this motion are substantially similar to those we rejected in Schneider’s previous pro se petition. For the reasons stated in that opinion, we deny the application to file a second petition as well as the motions recalling the mandate and for a stay of execution.

Schneider v. Delo, 105 F.3d 400, 1997 WL 30658 (8th Cir. 1997).

Pincite

105 F.3d 400 (Schneider v. Delo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related