Eric Adam Schneider v. Paul Delo, Eric Adam Schneider, Applicant v. Michael Bowersox
This text of 105 F.3d 400 (Eric Adam Schneider v. Paul Delo, Eric Adam Schneider, Applicant v. Michael Bowersox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Eric Adam SCHNEIDER, Appellant,
v.
Paul DELO, Appellee.
Eric Adam SCHNEIDER, Applicant,
v.
Michael BOWERSOX, Respondent.
Nos. 95-2969EM, 97-8008.
United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 23, 1997.
Decided Jan. 24, 1997.
Prior report: 85 F.3d 335.
Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Chief Judge, WOLLMAN and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner Eric Adam Schneider applies for leave to file a second petition for a writ of habeas corpus or, in the alternative, seeks an order recalling the mandate and granting him a rehearing. He also seeks a stay of execution pending resolution of the matter and leave to file in forma pauperis. The arguments in this motion are substantially similar to those we rejected in Schneider's previous pro se petition. For the reasons stated in that opinion, we deny the application to file a second petition as well as the motions recalling the mandate and for a stay of execution.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
105 F.3d 400, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 1625, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eric-adam-schneider-v-paul-delo-eric-adam-schneide-ca8-1997.