Schneider v. City of East Orange
This text of 510 A.2d 1118 (Schneider v. City of East Orange) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
W.J. SCHNEIDER AND K.B. MARCUS, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
CITY OF EAST ORANGE, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY, INTERVENOR-RESPONDENT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Alan R. Hammer argued the cause for appellants (Brach, Eichler, Rosenberg, Silver, Bernstein, Hammer & Gladstone, attorneys; Alan R. Hammer and Michael Pesce, of counsel; Michael Pesce and Daniel Keough, on the brief).
Saul A. Wolfe argued the cause for the respondent (Skoloff and Wolfe, attorneys; Saul A. Wolfe, of counsel; Robert F. Giancaterino, on the brief).
Harry Haushalter, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for the intervenor (Irwin I. Kimmelman, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; James J. Ciancia, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; Harry Haushalter, on the brief).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Gaynor, reported at 196 N.J. Super. 587 (1984).
For affirmance Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, POLLOCK, O'HERN, GARIBALDI and STEIN 6.
For reversal None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
510 A.2d 1118, 103 N.J. 115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schneider-v-city-of-east-orange-nj-1986.