Schmitt v. County
This text of 614 So. 2d 547 (Schmitt v. County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The order denying attorney’s fees is affirmed on authority of Couf v. DeBlaker, 652 F.2d 585 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921,102 S.Ct. 1278, 71 L.Ed.2d 462 (1982); and Chiplin Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Lebanon, 712 F.2d 1524 (1st Cir. 1983); see County Line Joint Venture v. City of Grand Prairie, Texas, 839 F.2d 1142 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 890, 109 S.Ct. 223, 102 L.Ed.2d 214 (1988); Quinn v. Bryson, 739 F.2d 8 (1st Cir.1984); see also Paul v. Davis, 424 U.S. 693, 96 S.Ct. 1155, 47 L.Ed.2d 405 (1976); Sharrow v. City of Dania, 83 So.2d 274 (Fla.1955). See generally Farrar v. Hobby, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 566, 121 L.Ed.2d 494 (1992).
As to the cross-appeal, we affirm.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
614 So. 2d 547, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 1382, 1993 WL 13451, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schmitt-v-county-fladistctapp-1993.