Schmidt v. Sobilo
This text of 144 A.D.2d 930 (Schmidt v. Sobilo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed without costs (see, Howard v Poseidon Pools, 134 AD2d 926, affd 72 NY2d 972, 134 AD2d 928 [appeal No. 2], lv denied 71 NY2d 806, 134 AD2d 928 [appeal No. 3], lv dismissed 72 NY2d 840; Manning v Manning, 134 AD2d 842, 843, affd 72 NY2d 972; Belling v Haugh’s Pools, 126 AD2d 958, lv denied 70 NY2d 602, rearg dismissed 70 NY2d 748). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Chautauqua County, Cass, J. — summary judgment.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Green and Law-ton, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
144 A.D.2d 930, 535 N.Y.S.2d 557, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14387, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schmidt-v-sobilo-nyappdiv-1988.