Manning v. Manning
134 A.D.2d 842
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 10, 1987·No. Appeal No. 1·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
— Order affirmed without costs (see, Belling v Haugh’s Pools, 126 AD2d 958, Iv denied 70 NY2d 602). Green, Pine and Davis, JJ., concur. Callahan, J. P., and Denman, J., concur on constraint of Howard v Poseidon Pools ([appeal No. 1] 134 AD2d 926 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Chautauqua County, [843]*843Francis, J. — summary judgment.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Denman, Green, Pine and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Manning v. Manning, 134 A.D.2d 842 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).
134 A.D.2d 842 (Manning v. Manning) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Schmidt v. Sobilo
144 A.D.2d 930 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)