Schlesinger v. Kessell
59 A. 1118, 71 N.J.L. 340, 1904 N.J. LEXIS 183
This text of 59 A. 1118 (Schlesinger v. Kessell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Schlesinger v. Kessell, 59 A. 1118, 71 N.J.L. 340, 1904 N.J. LEXIS 183 (N.J. 1904).
Opinion
The nonsuit disclosed byr the record was sustained in the Supreme Court upon the authority of Stout v. Humphrey, 40 Vroom 436.
We think this conclusion correct, and the judgment must therefore he affirmed.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Dixon, Garrison, Pitney, Bogert, Tredenburgh, Vroom, Green, Gray. 9.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Stout v. Humphrey
55 A. 281 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1903)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
59 A. 1118, 71 N.J.L. 340, 1904 N.J. LEXIS 183, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schlesinger-v-kessell-nj-1904.