Schlenger v. Ninth Street Bank & Trust Co.
This text of 231 A.D. 828 (Schlenger v. Ninth Street Bank & Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We are of opinion that there is nothing in the Florida statutes indicating that the Florida bank was dissolved. This being so, the appellant has [829]*829no title superior to that of an attaching creditor who is a resident of this State. (Willitts v. Waite, 25 N. Y. 577, which is approvingly cited in Deschenes v. Tallman, 248 id. 33, 38.) (See, also, Kelly v. Crapo, 45 N. Y. 86, 90.) Martyne v. American Union Fire Ins. Co. (216 N. Y. 183) involved a foreign corporation that had actually been dissolved, and the distinction is pointed out between that ease and the Willitts Case (supra) and cognate cases by Judge Chase, writing in the Martyne case. The order should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Tompkins, JJ., concur. Order denying motion to vacate attachment, to set aside service of summons and to dismiss complaint affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
231 A.D. 828, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schlenger-v-ninth-street-bank-trust-co-nyappdiv-1930.