Schlenger v. Ninth Street Bank & Trust Co.

231 A.D. 828
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 15, 1930
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 231 A.D. 828 (Schlenger v. Ninth Street Bank & Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schlenger v. Ninth Street Bank & Trust Co., 231 A.D. 828 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We are of opinion that there is nothing in the Florida statutes indicating that the Florida bank was dissolved. This being so, the appellant has [829]*829no title superior to that of an attaching creditor who is a resident of this State. (Willitts v. Waite, 25 N. Y. 577, which is approvingly cited in Deschenes v. Tallman, 248 id. 33, 38.) (See, also, Kelly v. Crapo, 45 N. Y. 86, 90.) Martyne v. American Union Fire Ins. Co. (216 N. Y. 183) involved a foreign corporation that had actually been dissolved, and the distinction is pointed out between that ease and the Willitts Case (supra) and cognate cases by Judge Chase, writing in the Martyne case. The order should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Tompkins, JJ., concur. Order denying motion to vacate attachment, to set aside service of summons and to dismiss complaint affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Doty v. Baltimore Trust Co.
147 Misc. 868 (New York Supreme Court, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
231 A.D. 828, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schlenger-v-ninth-street-bank-trust-co-nyappdiv-1930.