Schlegel v. Bank of America, NA

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Schlegel v. Bank of America, NA. Read the opinion of the Court — 258 F. App'x 543
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 17, 2007·No. 07-1765·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1765

KURT G. SCHLEGEL, Assignee of Piedmont Building and Development Corporation,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

BANK OF AMERICA, NA,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Norman K. Moon, District Judge. (3:07-cv-00022-nkm)

Submitted: December 13, 2007 Decided: December 17, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kurt G. Schlegel, Appellant Pro Se. Megan Conway Rahman, TROUTMAN & SANDERS, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Kurt G. Schlegel appeals the district court’s orders

dismissing his civil conspiracy complaint and denying his motion

for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. Schlegel v. Bank of America, NA, No. 3:07-cv-

00022-nkm (W.D. Va. June 12 & July 23, 2007). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schlegel v. Bank of America, NA, (4th Cir. 2007).

Schlegel v. Bank of America, NA (Schlegel v. Bank of America, NA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.