Schlegel v. Bank of America, NA

Fourth Circuit

Schlegel v. Bank of America, NA

258 F. App'x 543

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 17, 2007·No. No. 07-1765·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Kurt G. Schlegel appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil conspiracy complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Schlegel v. Bank of America, NA, 505 F.Supp.2d 321 (W.D.Va. 2007); No. 3:07-cv-00022-nkm, 2007 WL 2126358 (July 23, 2007). We dispense with [544]*544oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Kurt G. Schlegel appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil conspiracy complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Schlegel v. Bank of America, NA, 505 F.Supp.2d 321 (W.D.Va. 2007); No. 3:07-cv-00022-nkm, 2007 WL 2126358 (July 23, 2007). We dispense with [544]*544oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Schlegel v. Bank of America, NA, 258 F. App'x 543 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

258 F. App'x 543 (Schlegel v. Bank of America, NA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related