Schlarb v. Hartwell

196 N.E. 273, 129 Ohio St. 493, 129 Ohio St. (N.S.) 493, 2 Ohio Op. 484, 1935 Ohio LEXIS 314
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 22, 1935·No. 24814·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the Court of Appeals be, and the same is hereby, affirmed for the reason that this cause was heard by the Court of Appeals on appeal and no bill of exceptions was presented to and allowed by the Court of Appeals. Section 11566, General Code. (Hill v. Bassett, 27 Ohio St., 597; Detroit, Toledo & Ironton Rd. Co. v. Blaum, 120 Ohio St., 612, 169 N. E., 297; and Micklethwait v. City of Portsmouth, 110 Ohio St., 514, 144 N. E., 274.)

Judgment affirmed.

Weygandt, C. J., Stephenson, Williams, Jones, Matthias, Day and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schlarb v. Hartwell, 196 N.E. 273, 129 Ohio St. 493, 129 Ohio St. (N.S.) 493, 2 Ohio Op. 484, 1935 Ohio LEXIS 314 (Ohio 1935).

196 N.E. 273 (Schlarb v. Hartwell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Knowlson v. Bellman
160 Ohio St. (N.S.) 359 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1953)
DeMoss v. Conart Motor Sales, Inc.
78 N.E.2d 675 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1948)