Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Schlarb v. Hartwell

Schlarb v. Hartwell

196 N.E. 273, 129 Ohio St. 493, 129 Ohio St. (N.S.) 493, 2 Ohio Op. 484, 1935 Ohio LEXIS 314
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMay 22, 1935
Docket24814
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 196 N.E. 273 (Schlarb v. Hartwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schlarb v. Hartwell, 196 N.E. 273, 129 Ohio St. 493, 129 Ohio St. (N.S.) 493, 2 Ohio Op. 484, 1935 Ohio LEXIS 314 (Ohio 1935).

Opinion

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the Court of Appeals be, and the same is hereby, affirmed for the reason that this cause was heard by the Court of Appeals on appeal and no bill of exceptions was presented to and allowed by the Court of Appeals. Section 11566, General Code. (Hill v. Bassett, 27 Ohio St., 597; Detroit, Toledo & Ironton Rd. Co. v. Blaum, 120 Ohio St., 612, 169 N. E., 297; and Micklethwait v. City of Portsmouth, 110 Ohio St., 514, 144 N. E., 274.)

Judgment affirmed.

Weygandt, C. J., Stephenson, Williams, Jones, Matthias, Day and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Luper v. Action Industries, Inc. (In re Lee Way Holding Co.)
113 B.R. 410 (S.D. Ohio, 1990)
Knowlson v. Bellman
160 Ohio St. (N.S.) 359 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1953)
DeMoss v. Conart Motor Sales, Inc.
78 N.E.2d 675 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1948)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
196 N.E. 273, 129 Ohio St. 493, 129 Ohio St. (N.S.) 493, 2 Ohio Op. 484, 1935 Ohio LEXIS 314, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schlarb-v-hartwell-ohio-1935.