Detroit, Toledo Ironton Rd. Co. v. Blaum

169 N.E. 297, 120 Ohio St. 612, 120 Ohio St. (N.S.) 612, 1929 Ohio LEXIS 404
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 13, 1929·No. 21262·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that said cause was heard on appeal by the Court of Appeals and no bill of exceptions was allowed and filed in said court as required by law.

Petition in error dismissed.

Marshall, C. J., Kinkade, Robinson, Jones, Matthias, Day and Allen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Detroit, Toledo Ironton Rd. Co. v. Blaum, 169 N.E. 297, 120 Ohio St. 612, 120 Ohio St. (N.S.) 612, 1929 Ohio LEXIS 404 (Ohio 1929).

169 N.E. 297 (Detroit, Toledo Ironton Rd. Co. v. Blaum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Knowlson v. Bellman
160 Ohio St. (N.S.) 359 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1953)
DeMoss v. Conart Motor Sales, Inc.
78 N.E.2d 675 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1948)
Schlarb v. Hartwell
196 N.E. 273 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1935)