Schisano v. Brickseal Refractory Co.
164 A.2d 602, 33 N.J. 323, 1960 N.J. LEXIS 161
This text of 164 A.2d 602 (Schisano v. Brickseal Refractory Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Schisano v. Brickseal Refractory Co., 164 A.2d 602, 33 N.J. 323, 1960 N.J. LEXIS 161 (N.J. 1960).
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of Judge Sullivan in the court below.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Weinteaub, and Justices Jacobs, Eeancis and Peoctok — 4.
For reversal — Justices Bukling, Hall and Schettino — 3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Doe v. State
76 A.3d 774 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 2013)
Davis v. DEVEREUX FOUNDATION
997 A.2d 273 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2010)
Kulbacki v. Sobchinsky
185 A.2d 835 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1962)
Hagopian v. Fuchs
169 A.2d 172 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1961)
Douglas v. Harris
164 A.2d 602 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1960)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
164 A.2d 602, 33 N.J. 323, 1960 N.J. LEXIS 161, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schisano-v-brickseal-refractory-co-nj-1960.