Schisano v. Brickseal Refractory Co.
164 A.2d 602, 33 N.J. 323, 1960 N.J. LEXIS 161
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of Judge Sullivan in the court below.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Weinteaub, and Justices Jacobs, Eeancis and Peoctok — 4.
For reversal — Justices Bukling, Hall and Schettino — 3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Schisano v. Brickseal Refractory Co., 164 A.2d 602, 33 N.J. 323, 1960 N.J. LEXIS 161 (N.J. 1960).
164 A.2d 602 (Schisano v. Brickseal Refractory Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Doe v. State
76 A.3d 774 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 2013)
Davis v. DEVEREUX FOUNDATION
997 A.2d 273 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2010)
Kulbacki v. Sobchinsky
185 A.2d 835 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1962)
Hagopian v. Fuchs
169 A.2d 172 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1961)
Douglas v. Harris
164 A.2d 602 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1960)