Schimkevitz v. Bingham
110 N.Y.S. 219
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Schimkevitz v. Bingham. Read the opinion of the Court — 125 A.D. 792 →
Opinions
The question presented on this appeal is the same as that presented in the case of Shepard v. Bingham (decided here[220]*220with) 110 N. Y. Supp. 217, and for the reasons there stated the order appealed from is reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion for an injunction denied, with $10 costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Schimkevitz v. Bingham, 110 N.Y.S. 219 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).
110 N.Y.S. 219 (Schimkevitz v. Bingham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Eden Musee American Co. v. Bingham
125 A.D. 780 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1908)
Shepard v. Bingham
125 A.D. 784 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1908)