Schimkevitz v. Bingham
125 A.D. 792, 110 N.Y.S. 219, 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2896
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 8, 1908·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinions
The question presented on this appeal is the same as that presented in the casez of Shepard v. Bingham (125 App. Div. 784), decided herewith, and for the reasons there stated the order appealed from is reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion for an injunction denied, with ten dollars costs.
Present — Ingeaham, McLaughlin, Laughlin, Claeke and Scott, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Schimkevitz v. Bingham, 125 A.D. 792, 110 N.Y.S. 219, 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2896 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).
125 A.D. 792 (Schimkevitz v. Bingham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Strand Amusement Co. v. City of Owensboro
47 S.W.2d 710 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1932)