Scheffler v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.

19 N.W. 656, 32 Minn. 125, 1884 Minn. LEXIS 105
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedMay 31, 1884
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 19 N.W. 656 (Scheffler v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scheffler v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co., 19 N.W. 656, 32 Minn. 125, 1884 Minn. LEXIS 105 (Mich. 1884).

Opinion

Gilfillan, C. J.1

The action is brought by 'a father to recover for the killing, through the alleged negligence of the defendant, of his son, a child 17 months old, whereby the plaintiff, as he alleges, has been and will be deprived of the services of said son. The statute provides: “A cause of action arising out of an injury to the person dies with the person of either party.” Gen. St. 1878, c. 77, § 1.. This is only declaratory of the rule at common law. Insurance Co. v. Brame, 95 U. S. 754, and cases cited; Carey v. Berkshire R. Co., 1 Cush. 475. The statute (Gen. St. 1878, c. 77, § 2,) creates a cause of action when death is caused by the wrongful act or omission of [126]*126any- party, and vests it in the personal representative, to wit, the executor or administrator. No one else can sue upon it. Nash v. Tousley, 28 Minn. 5.

Order reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Loegering v. County of Todd
185 F. Supp. 134 (D. Minnesota, 1960)
Eklund v. Evans
300 N.W. 617 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1941)
Albrecht v. Potthoff
257 N.W. 377 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1934)
Aho v. Jesmore
112 N.W. 538 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1907)
Swift & Co. v. Johnson
138 F. 867 (Eighth Circuit, 1905)
Harshman v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.
103 N.W. 412 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1905)
Negaubauer v. Great Northern Railway Co.
99 N.W. 620 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1904)
United States Electric Lighting Co. v. Sullivan
22 App. D.C. 115 (D.C. Circuit, 1903)
Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Miller
37 N.E. 343 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1894)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 N.W. 656, 32 Minn. 125, 1884 Minn. LEXIS 105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scheffler-v-minneapolis-st-louis-railway-co-minn-1884.