Scheehle v. Justices of the Supreme Court of Arizona
This text of 315 F.3d 1191 (Scheehle v. Justices of the Supreme Court of Arizona) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
The heart of Appellant’s constitutional claim centers around whether he may be compelled, without just compensation, to participate as an arbitrator in the Marico-pa County civil arbitration project. The Arizona Supreme Court, in response to a question certified to them, has determined that A.R.S. § 12-133 does not authorize the creation of an arbitration system mandating lawyer participation. We now remand to the district court to determine the present position of the parties and the jurisdictional and other status of the litigation in light of this development.
REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
315 F.3d 1191, 2003 Daily Journal DAR 327, 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 273, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 329, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scheehle-v-justices-of-the-supreme-court-of-arizona-ca9-2003.