Scheehle v. Justices of the Supreme Court of Arizona

Ninth Circuit

Scheehle v. Justices of the Supreme Court of Arizona

315 F.3d 1191, 2003 Daily Journal DAR 327, 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 273, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 329

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided January 10, 2003·No. No. 00-15457·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

ORDER

The heart of Appellant’s constitutional claim centers around whether he may be compelled, without just compensation, to participate as an arbitrator in the Marico-pa County civil arbitration project. The Arizona Supreme Court, in response to a question certified to them, has determined that A.R.S. § 12-133 does not authorize the creation of an arbitration system mandating lawyer participation. We now remand to the district court to determine the present position of the parties and the jurisdictional and other status of the litigation in light of this development.

REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The heart of Appellant’s constitutional claim centers around whether he may be compelled, without just compensation, to participate as an arbitrator in the Marico-pa County civil arbitration project. The Arizona Supreme Court, in response to a question certified to them, has determined that A.R.S. § 12-133 does not authorize the creation of an arbitration system mandating lawyer participation. We now remand to the district court to determine the present position of the parties and the jurisdictional and other status of the litigation in light of this development.

REMANDED.

Scheehle v. Justices of the Supreme Court of Arizona, 315 F.3d 1191, 2003 Daily Journal DAR 327, 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 273, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 329 (9th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

315 F.3d 1191 (Scheehle v. Justices of the Supreme Court of Arizona) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related