Schaumburg v. United States

Supreme Court

Schaumburg v. United States

103 U.S. 667, 26 L. Ed. 599, 1880 U.S. LEXIS 2171

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedMay 18, 1881

Docket274

StatusPublished

Cited by12 cases

This text of 103 U.S. 667 (Schaumburg v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schaumburg v. United States, 103 U.S. 667, 26 L. Ed. 599, 1880 U.S. LEXIS 2171 (1881).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Chiee Justice Waite

delivered the opinion of the-court.

The judgment in this case is affirmed on the authority of United States v. Eckford, 6 Wall. 484. Claims for credit can be used in suits against persons indebted to the United States to reduce or extinguish the debt, but not as the foundation of a judgment' against the government. In the present case the court instructed the jury as matter of law that the plaintiff in error, from July 1, 1836, until March 24, 1845, was in the military service of the United States as a first lieutenant of dragoons or cavalry; and that he was entitled as such to credit for the pay and emoluments that accrued during that period, and this was admitted to exceed the debt sued on by the United States. The jury thereupon brought in a verdict for the defendant. Had the jury gone further and struck the balance that would be due from the United States, no judgment could have been rendered for it. Any verdict, therefore, beyond .the one actually given would have been fruitless. The court itself decided that the plaintiff in error was entitled to his pay and emoluments from July 1, 1836, to March 24, 1845. While sometimes the jury have been permitted to certify to a balance they find to be due from the government in cases of this kind, and under some circumstances it may be proper they should do so, ¿.refusal of the court to direct that it be done cannot be reviewed here.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Chiee Justice Waite

delivered the opinion of the-court.

The judgment in this case is affirmed on the authority of United States v. Eckford, 6 Wall. 484. Claims for credit can be used in suits against persons indebted to the United States to reduce or extinguish the debt, but not as the foundation of a judgment' against the government. In the present case the court instructed the jury as matter of law that the plaintiff in error, from July 1, 1836, until March 24, 1845, was in the military service of the United States as a first lieutenant of dragoons or cavalry; and that he was entitled as such to credit for the pay and emoluments that accrued during that period, and this was admitted to exceed the debt sued on by the United States. The jury thereupon brought in a verdict for the defendant. Had the jury gone further and struck the balance that would be due from the United States, no judgment could have been rendered for it. Any verdict, therefore, beyond .the one actually given would have been fruitless. The court itself decided that the plaintiff in error was entitled to his pay and emoluments from July 1, 1836, to March 24, 1845. While sometimes the jury have been permitted to certify to a balance they find to be due from the government in cases of this kind, and under some circumstances it may be proper they should do so, ¿.refusal of the court to direct that it be done cannot be reviewed here.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

103 U.S. 667, 26 L. Ed. 599, 1880 U.S. LEXIS 2171, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schaumburg-v-united-states-scotus-1881.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack