Schantz v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
178 A. 768, 115 N.J.L. 174, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 284
This text of 178 A. 768 (Schantz v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Schantz v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 178 A. 768, 115 N.J.L. 174, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 284 (N.J. 1935).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for ■ the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Lloyd in the Supreme Court.
*175 For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Parker, Bodihe, Heher, Perskie, Yah Buskirk, Kays, Dear, Wells, JJ. 9.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Rodríguez Vda. de Rivera v. Pueblo Supermarkets, Inc.
102 P.R. Dec. 134 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1974)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
178 A. 768, 115 N.J.L. 174, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 284, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schantz-v-sears-roebuck-co-nj-1935.