Schantz v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
178 A. 768, 115 N.J.L. 174, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 284
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for ■ the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Lloyd in the Supreme Court.
*175 For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Parker, Bodihe, Heher, Perskie, Yah Buskirk, Kays, Dear, Wells, JJ. 9.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Schantz v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 178 A. 768, 115 N.J.L. 174, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 284 (N.J. 1935).
178 A. 768 (Schantz v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rodríguez Vda. de Rivera v. Pueblo Supermarkets, Inc.
102 P.R. Dec. 134 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1974)