Schantz v. Rachlin

104 N.J. Super. 154

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division·Decided January 15, 1969·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Pee Cubiam.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons given by Judge Lane in his opinion, reported at 101 N. J. Super. 334 (Ch. Div. 1968).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schantz v. Rachlin, 104 N.J. Super. 154 (N.J. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

104 N.J. Super. 154 (Schantz v. Rachlin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.