Schantz v. Rachlin
This text of 249 A.2d 18 (Schantz v. Rachlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NORMAN SCHANTZ AND SANDRA SCHANTZ, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, JOHN T. BROCKWELL AND ABBIE BROCKWELL, PLAINTIFFS - INTERVENORS - APPELLANTS,
v.
EDGAR L. RACHLIN, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Before Judges SULLIVAN, FOLEY and LEWIS.
Mr. Philip J. Blanda, Jr., argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Blanda and Blanda, attorneys).
Mr. Albert G. Besser argued the cause for defendant-respondent (Messrs. Hannoch, Weisman, Stern & Besser, attorneys; Mr. Bruce Lubitz, on the brief).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons given by Judge Lane in his opinion, reported at 101 N.J. Super. 334 (Ch. Div. 1968).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
249 A.2d 18, 104 N.J. Super. 154, 1969 N.J. Super. LEXIS 562, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schantz-v-rachlin-njsuperctappdiv-1969.