Schall v. City of New York

84 N.Y.S. 737
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 20, 1903·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

JENKS, J.

These are actions against a municipal corporation for negligence in the care of a street. The woman complains that, while walking thereon in the daytime, she fell and was injured by falling or slipping into a depression in the sidewalk which was about 15 feet wide. The testimony for the plaintiff shows that the depression, which was near the curb, was 4 feet long, 11 inches wide, 3½ inches [738]*738deep, and had existed for several years. I think that Hamilton v. City of Buffalo, 173 N. Y. 72, 65 N. E. 944, must control.

The judgment and order should be reversed, and a new trial ordered; costs to abide the event. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schall v. City of New York, 84 N.Y.S. 737 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1903).

84 N.Y.S. 737 (Schall v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hopson v. City of Detroit
209 N.W. 161 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1926)
Cornell v. City of Ypsilanti
180 N.W. 405 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1920)
Shugren v. Salt Lake City
159 P. 530 (Utah Supreme Court, 1916)