Schall v. City of New York

88 A.D. 64
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 1, 1903·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Jenks, J.:

These are actions against a municipal corporation for negligence in the care of a street. The woman complains that while walking thereon in the daytime she fell and was injured'by falling or "slipping into a depression in the sidewalk, which was about fifteen feet wide. The testimony for the plaintiff shows that the depression, which was near the .curb, was four feet long, eleven inches wide, [65] three and one-hálf inches deep, and had existed for several years. I think that Hamilton v. City of Buffalo (173 N. Y. 72) must control.

The judgment and order should be reversed, and a new trial ordered, costs to abide the event.

Goodrich, P. J., Bartlett, Woodward and Hooker, JJ., concurred.

Judgments and orders of the Municipal Court reversed and new trials ordered, costs to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schall v. City of New York, 88 A.D. 64 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1903).

88 A.D. 64 (Schall v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cornell v. City of Ypsilanti
180 N.W. 405 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1920)
Shugren v. Salt Lake City
159 P. 530 (Utah Supreme Court, 1916)
Duffy v. City of New York
149 A.D. 478 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1912)
Carr v. Degnon Contracting Co.
48 Misc. 531 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905)