Schackman v. Arnebergh
This text of 387 U.S. 427 (Schackman v. Arnebergh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellants seek review by this Court of the refusal by the District Court to convene a three-judge District Court pursuant to 28 U. S. C. §§ 2281-2284. We have held that such review is available in the Court of Appeals, Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp. v. Epstein, 370 U. S. 713, and not in this Court. Buchanan v. Rhodes, 385 U. S. 3.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
387 U.S. 427, 18 L. Ed. 2d 865, 87 S. Ct. 1622, 1967 U.S. LEXIS 1332, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schackman-v-arnebergh-scotus-1967.