Schackman v. Arnebergh

387 U.S. 427, 18 L. Ed. 2d 865, 87 S. Ct. 1622, 1967 U.S. LEXIS 1332
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 29, 1967·No. 1186·Published·Cited by 76 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellants seek review by this Court of the refusal by the District Court to convene a three-judge District Court pursuant to 28 U. S. C. §§ 2281-2284. We have held that such review is available in the Court of Appeals, Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp. v. Epstein, 370 U. S. 713, and not in this Court. Buchanan v. Rhodes, 385 U. S. 3.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schackman v. Arnebergh, 387 U.S. 427, 18 L. Ed. 2d 865, 87 S. Ct. 1622, 1967 U.S. LEXIS 1332 (1967).

387 U.S. 427 (Schackman v. Arnebergh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Slagle
504 U.S. 952 (Supreme Court, 1992)
Backus v. Spears
677 F.2d 397 (Fourth Circuit, 1982)
New Jersey Education Association v. Fred G. Burke
579 F.2d 764 (Third Circuit, 1978)
New Jersey Education Ass'n v. Burke
579 F.2d 764 (Third Circuit, 1978)
Wilson v. Edelman
542 F.2d 1260 (Seventh Circuit, 1976)
United States v. Hughes Memorial Home
396 F. Supp. 544 (W.D. Virginia, 1975)
Weiser v. White
505 F.2d 912 (Fifth Circuit, 1975)
Gonzalez v. Automatic Employees Credit Union
419 U.S. 90 (Supreme Court, 1974)
Quadra v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CITY & CTY. OF SAN FRANCISCO
378 F. Supp. 605 (N.D. California, 1974)
Hartmann v. Scott
488 F.2d 1215 (Eighth Circuit, 1973)
Port of New York Authority v. United States
451 F.2d 783 (Second Circuit, 1971)
Hicks v. Pleasure House, Inc.
404 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1971)
Crossen v. Breckenridge
446 F.2d 833 (Sixth Circuit, 1971)